Ombudsman Directs RACT Insurance to Honour Car Crash Claim Despite Undisclosed Damage
Ombudsman Directs RACT Insurance to Honour Car Crash Claim Despite Undisclosed Damage
1
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has intervened to instruct RACT Insurance to process a claim for a policyholder who failed to disclose prior damage to his four-wheel drive.
Initially, when securing the insurance over the phone, the owner described the vehicle as being in "good shape" with only minor scratches.
However, post-accident assessments by RACT revealed damage that seemed to have existed before the incident.
According to the claimant, the superficial damage to parts such as panels, bumpers, and the tailgate occurred in two separate instances only after purchasing the policy. RACT acknowledged these claims of post-policy incidents but argued that they didn't explain all the observed damage, suggesting a misrepresentation of the vehicle's condition at the time of policy commencement.
Despite recognising the policyholder's partial misrepresentation, AFCA highlighted that RACT had not definitively proven it would have declined insurance had the accurate condition been disclosed. The insurer's guidelines indicate that cars with "extensive damage" are automatically ineligible for coverage; however, those with "some damage" may still qualify. AFCA determined that the identified damage likened more to "some damage" than the "extensive damage" that would categorically void coverage.
This determination underscores the significance of transparent communication between policyholders and insurers regarding vehicle conditions. It highlights the thresholds insurance companies apply in policy evaluations and the necessity of their transparency. This decision not only affects the insured's entitlement to coverage but also serves as a key precedent for similar cases, promoting greater clarity about what constitutes significant pre-existing damage that could deny coverage.
The decision sets a vital precedent in the insurance industry, reinforcing the need for clear disclosure guidelines and policies that articulate what qualifies as unacceptable pre-existing damage. Insurers might need to revisit and possibly adjust their underwriting criteria to ensure alignment with regulatory expectations and reduce disputes. For the consumer, this case serves as a reminder of the importance of full disclosure and understanding the conditions under which their policy operates.
Published:Friday, 3rd Oct 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Recent revelations have cast a spotlight on Netstrata, a prominent strata management firm in Australia, for imposing insurance brokerage fees significantly higher than industry norms. This development has ignited a broader discussion about the need for transparency and reform within the strata management sector. - read more
Bobby Lehane, CEO of PICA Group, has issued a cautionary statement regarding the future of the strata management sector in Australia. He emphasized that eliminating insurance commissions could pose a significant threat to the industry's viability, drawing parallels to the challenges faced by the aged care sector. - read more
Strata property owners in North and Central Queensland are being encouraged to take advantage of new federal and state initiatives designed to reduce insurance premiums and improve cyclone resilience. These programs offer financial incentives for property upgrades that can lead to significant savings on insurance costs. - read more
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is calling on insurers to enhance their communication regarding premium increases to help resolve disputes more effectively and fairly. The authority suggests that offering flexible payment options could also aid in managing disputes. - read more
Leading Australian life insurer TAL has reported a substantial $4.7 billion in life insurance claims paid over the 12 months ending March 31, 2025. This figure underscores the significant role life insurers play in providing financial support to Australians during challenging times. - read more
In the dynamic world of running a nightclub, unforeseen incidents can happen at any time. Whether it's a lively crowd that gets out of hand or an unexpected electrical issue that disrupts your night, the challenges of managing a nightlife venue are uniquely demanding. That's why having the right insurance coverage is not just advisable, it's essential for every nightclub owner. - read more
Running a nightclub is no small feat. It's a lively business that offers entertainment and enjoyment. Yet, it also comes with its own set of risks. That's where nightclub insurance comes in. Just as you craft the perfect atmosphere for your patrons, having the right insurance ensures that the unexpected doesn't catch you off guard. - read more
Business interruption insurance is a crucial safeguard for nightclub owners who want to protect their revenue streams from unexpected disruptions. This type of insurance is designed to cover the loss of income that businesses suffer after a disaster-related closing of the business premises or due to the rebuilding process afterward. - read more
Picture this: it's a busy Saturday night at your nightclub. The dance floor is packed, the DJ is spinning tunes, and everyone's having a great time. Suddenly, someone trips and falls, injuring themselves. In such situations, having the right insurance can be crucial. That's where public liability insurance comes into play. - read more
Running a nightclub in Australia can be an exciting venture, but like any business, it comes with its fair share of risks. Nightclub insurance is a crucial safeguard that shields you from the unforeseen, be it a simple accident or a significant mishap. This specialized insurance is pivotal for protecting your establishment, patrons, and the bottom line. - read more
Knowledgebase
Copayment: A fixed amount you pay for a covered healthcare service, usually when you receive the service.